Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 28

Thread: For and against: Voice Overs

  1. #11
    Inactive Member Yammeryammeryammer's Avatar
    Join Date
    March 30th, 2002
    Posts
    337
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Voice overs can be good, they can be shit, and I don't particularly hate or like them because they are simply one of many cinematic tools at your disposal. Some movies rely on them more than others. For instance, Fight Club relies completely on the voice overs to link everything together. It is a very very skilled use, and isn't corny in the slightest. If you just hate voice overs because they allow the filmmakers to loosen up on the visual aspect of their picture, then don't use them.

  2. #12
    Inactive Member Tongachud's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 17th, 2004
    Posts
    24
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Words are sometimes worth a thousand pictures.

  3. #13
    Inactive Member Brainmuncher's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 26th, 2003
    Posts
    137
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    one word- Adaptation

  4. #14
    Inactive Member ac_01's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 18th, 2001
    Posts
    226
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    The screenwriter's rule book states: "The one thing you must never do is start a film with voiceover and boring exposition about where you are. And if you assume to use voiceover you must at least identify who the voice belongs to."

    The Third Man evidently throws the rule book out the window. "What happened with The Third Man," Hare explains, "is that in the cutting room they couldn't get into the film, so they had the idea to put a prologue on the front in which they'd explain everything to the audience - thus breaking all the rules.

    The man who speaks that prologue is not in the film. It turns out he's Carol Reed, the director of the movie, who simply went into a sound booth and did that voiceover.

    "(In the film) you never know who that man is, he's never referred to again and he's not integral to the plot. And yet the genius of it is this 'clubland tone' the man has, as if he's sitting in a chair next to you by the fire and he is the storyteller. But at no point is it explained that he's the storyteller and it's the most extraordinary set-up for a film."
    <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">That's just one example. Another would be American Beauty.

  5. #15
    Inactive Member Gwailofilms's Avatar
    Join Date
    August 4th, 2000
    Posts
    161
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    "She said we should meet at the club, right away. As I had never heard of the Club Rightaway, I suggested that we meet at Club Flamingo instead."

    The Naked Gun. Best use of voiceover ever. [img]biggrin.gif[/img]

  6. #16
    Inactive Member twister!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    June 24th, 2001
    Posts
    1,034
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    There are so many good examples of voice overs in so many great films. As others have commented, the point is the same as applies to many film techniques - if it's used poorly, and without careful consideration it's going to have a negative effect. The thing I didn't understand were the comments from people saying that they just don't like voice overs regardless of how and when they are used... I was wondering whether I was missing something...

  7. #17
    Inactive Member Vertino's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 9th, 1999
    Posts
    388
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Its interesting when the Voice Over interacts with the characters on-screen... like in Fight Club, with Edward Norton's narration.

  8. #18
    Inactive Member twister!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    June 24th, 2001
    Posts
    1,034
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Yep, that whole Ed Norton voice over sequece at the start of Fight Club is superb!

  9. #19
    Inactive Member bigmasi's Avatar
    Join Date
    March 5th, 2004
    Posts
    170
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Originally posted by Justin M.:
    I've read a few comments on the board recently about how people 'hate' voice overs.
    <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">yeah, that was me and Tongachud gave me critic at once... *laughs*

    Ok, the thing is like everybody here said. Good ones and bad ones. I just don't think that VO's can add much to the movie (lot of times they just take away the possibility to think independently as a viewer by explaining everything), but there is movies that are more or less based on VO and that's a different thing. For example Trainspotting.

    Originally posted by Justin M.:
    I love voice overs in films - it gives much much more of an insight into a character's thoughts than can be achieved through spoken dialogue alone.
    <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">There's much more in a movie than only VO's and spoken dialogue ;-) When I said I hate VO's I wasn't suggesting anyone to replace VO with only spoken dialogue...

    <font color="#a62a2a" size="1">[ April 21, 2004 06:55 PM: Message edited by: bigmasi ]</font>

  10. #20
    Inactive Member Curtin-Parloe's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 6th, 2000
    Posts
    376
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    I'm redrafting a script with VO, my first to include it. Like everyone seems to, I think it has its place. I disagree with you on one pooint bigmasi, I think a good VO can transform a film.

    For example, say what you like about Blade Runner, but the difference between the VO cut and the "directors" cut is immense; they are two very different films. I happen to prefer the DC, but I suspect its appeal would have been significantly more limited than the VO cut.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •